Thanh bên bài viết

pdf
Ngày xuất bản: 31/12/2022
Số lượt xem tóm tắt: 220
Số lượt xem pdf: 78
DOI: https://doi.org/10.59907/daujs.1.04.2022.77
Số xuất bản
Tập 1 Số 4 (2022)
Chuyên mục
KHOA HỌC KỸ THUẬT VÀ CÔNG NGHỆ
Trích dẫn bài báo
Tạ, T. H. (2022). Đánh giá hiệu quả sinh thái tại Việt Nam giai đoạn 1999-2017 bằng phương pháp phân tách và tiếp cận chỉ số hiệu quả Malmquist DEA. Tạp chí Khoa học Đại học Đông Á, 1(4), 14-27. https://doi.org/10.59907/daujs.1.04.2022.77

Đánh giá hiệu quả sinh thái tại Việt Nam giai đoạn 1999-2017 bằng phương pháp phân tách và tiếp cận chỉ số hiệu quả Malmquist DEA

Tạ Thị Hương

Nội dung chính của bài viết

Tóm tắt

The relationship between economic development accompanied by environmental friendliness, and ecological balance is the top concern of the strategic planners of sustainable development in each country. Based on Tapio decoupling analysis and measure productivity index from Malmquist - Data Envelopment Analysis Vietnam’s eco-efficiency during 1990-2017 was investigated. The outstanding results are as follows: Since 2004 onwards, the changes have been recorded in the relationship between affluence and the environment - the ecosystem under the gradual diversity of degrees: expansive decoupling; weak decoupling; expansive coupling, and strong decoupling under Tapio decoupling analysis. At the same time, the Malmquist productivity index has improved slightly with 4.4% over 28 studied years. It shows that Vietnam gradually approaching and implementing strategies for improving the quality of the environment and the ecosystem. However, there is still an upward trend in the amount of emission with an annual emission growth rate of 43.4% while the economic development rate has not shown balance and similarities. Therefore, the reform of management policy, scientific strategy, and updating of technology system should be considered and implemented synchronously to maintain this change and promote the development in a more positive  direction.

Chi tiết bài viết

Từ khóa

eco-efficiency, Malmquist productivity index, sustainable development , Tapio decoupling, Vietnam

Tài liệu tham khảo

ADB. (2013). Vietnam: Environment and climate change assessment.
Baruya, P. (2010). Prospects for coal and clean coal technologies in Vietnam. London, UK: IEA Clean Coal Centre.
Candemir, M., Özcan, M., Güneş, M., & Deliktaş, E. (2011). Technical efficiency and total factor productivity growth in the hazelnut agricultural sales cooperatives unions in Turkey. Mathematical and Computational Applications, 16(1), 66-76.
Dellepiane, U., Di Marcantonio, M., Laghi, E., & Renzi, S. (2015). Bankruptcy prediction using support vector machines and feature selection during the recent financial crisis. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 7(8), 182-195.
Gudipudi, R., Lüdeke, M. K., Rybski, D., & Kropp, J. P. (2018). Benchmarking urban eco-efficiency and urbanites' perception. Cities, 74, 109-118.
IEA, I. (2017). CO2 emissions from fuel combustion 2017-highlights. International Energy Agency 1: 1–162.
Khandker, S. R., Barnes, D. F., Samad, H. A., & Minh, N. H. (2009). Welfare impacts of rural electrification: evidence from Vietnam. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, (5057).
Lee, C. (2011, July). Malmquist productivity analysis using DEA frontier in Stata. In CHI11 Stata Conference (No. 21). Stata Users Group.
Li, J., Ma, J., & Wei, W. (2020). Analysis and evaluation of the regional characteristics of carbon emission efficiency for China. Sustainability, 12(8), 3138.
Li, W., 2009. Eco-Innovation Policies in The People’s Republic of China. Country profiles on policies to support environment-friendly innovation.
Liang, Z., Zhang, M., Mao, Q., Yu, B., & Ma, B. (2018). Improvement of eco-efficiency in China: A comparison of mandatory and hybrid environmental policy instruments. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(7), 1473.
Long, R., Ouyang, H., & Guo, H. (2020). Super-slack-based measuring data envelopment analysis on the spatial–temporal patterns of logistics ecological efficiency using global Malmquist Index model. Environmental Technology & Innovation, 18, 100770.
Long, R., Ouyang, H., & Guo, H. (2020a). Super-slack-based measuring data envelopment analysis on the spatial–temporal patterns of logistics ecological efficiency using global Malmquist Index model. Environmental Technology & Innovation, 18, 100770.
Long, R., Ouyang, H., Guo, H., (2020b). Environmental Technology & Innovation Super-slack-based measuring data envelopment analysis on the spatial - temporal patterns of logistics ecological efficiency using global Malmquist Index model. Environmental Technology & Innovation 18, 100770.
Pai, J. T., Hu, D., & Liao, W. W. (2018). Research on eco-efficiency of industrial parks in Taiwan. Energy Procedia, 152, 691-697.
Pathak, H. P. (2019). Malmquist Productivity Index Approach in Assessing Performance of Commercial Banks: Evidence from Nepal. NRB Economic Review, 31(2), 25-55.
Perkins, D. H., & Anh, V. T. T. (2010). Vietnam's Industrial Policy: Designing Policies for Sustainable Development (No. 3). United Nations Development Programme.
Ren, X. S., Liu, Y. J., & Zhao, G. H. (2020). The impact and transmission mechanism of economic agglomeration on carbon intensity. China Popul. Resour. Environ, 30, 95-106.
Roh, C. Y., Park, C., & Moon, M. J. (2011). Economic performances of US non-profit hospitals using the Malmquist productivity change index. Journal of Management and Marketing Research, 8, 1.
The World Bank, 2017. World Development Indicators. National accounts data, and OECD national accounts data files.
The World Bank, 2018. World Integrated Trade Solution (WITS): Access and retrieve information on trade and tariffs.
Thieriot, H., & Sawyer, D. (2015). Development of eco-efficient industrial parks in China: A review.
Valdivia, S. M., & Ugaya, C. M. (2011). Life Cycle Inventories of Gold Artisanal and Small‐Scale Mining Activities in Peru: Toward Indicators for South America. Journal of industrial Ecology, 15(6), 922-936.
Wang, H., Hashimoto, S., Yue, Q., Moriguchi, Y., & Lu, Z. (2013). Decoupling analysis of four selected countries: China, Russia, Japan, and the United States during 2000–2007. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 17(4), 618-629.
Wang, Q., Zhao, M., & Li, R. (2019). Decoupling sectoral economic output from carbon emissions on city level: a comparative study of Beijing and Shanghai, China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 209, 126-133.
Wei, P. Y. (2020). Decoupling analysis of urban construction land expansion and economic growth: a case study of Cheng-Yu economic zone. DEStech Trans. Soc. Sci. Educ. Hum. Sci, 10.
Zhang, Y., Yu, Z., & Zhang, J. (2021). Analysis of carbon emission performance and regional differences in China’s eight economic regions: Based on the super-efficiency SBM model and the Theil index. Plos one, 16(5), e0250994.
Zhou, P., & Ang, B. W. (2008). Decomposition of aggregate CO2 emissions: a production-theoretical approach. Energy economics, 30(3), 1054-1067.