Thanh bên bài viết
Số lượt xem PDF: 9
Collecting Champa Art: The Role of Charles Lemire and Henri Parmentier in the Establishment of the Da Nang Museum of Cham Sculpture.
Nội dung chính của bài viết
Tóm tắt
This article examines several arguments proposed by the art historian Julian Brown concerning the collection of Champa sculpture[1] by Charles Lemire and Henri Parmentier. Lemire is considered to have laid the foundation for the establishment of the Musée Čam de Tourane (the predecessor of the Da Nang Museum of Cham Sculpture), while Parmentier realized Lemire’s original vision and played a pivotal role in the early collection, construction, and exhibition of the museum. The article analyzes the motivations and objectives underlying the work of each collector within the historical context of Vietnam under French colonial rule in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. It argues that colonial administrators and archaeologists collected Champa art for various purposes including private possession, cultural preservation, public display, and commercial sale, and that the collecting of Asian art functioned as a representation of colonial power, particularly for France and other European nation-states.
[1] Champa is a term transliterated from the Sanskrit word Campā, which appears in inscriptions to refer to the polities located in central Vietnam. Recent scholarship has argued that Champa should be understood as a generic term used to refer to a group of coastal and Central Highlands polities in central Vietnam until the early nineteenth century (Taylor 1992, 153–157; Hall 1992, 252–260; Southworth 2001, 21–25; Lockhart 2010, 1–53). In this article, the term Champa is used when referring to sculptural objects and religious or architectural monuments associated with Champa polities. In addition, terms such as “Cham” and “Chàm” also appear in this article when referring to the name of the Cham Museum at different historical periods—for example, the Musée Cam de Tourane during the period 1919–1935, whose official name today is the Da Nang Museum of Cham Sculpture. Moreover, in French archival sources and earlier translated materials, the term “Chàm” continues to be used. The author employs these terms depending on the context.
Chi tiết bài viết
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Từ khóa
Charles Lemire, Henri Parmentier, Museum of Cham Sculpture, colonial collecting, Champa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Beurdeley, J.-M. (1997). La collection Morice du Musée d’Histoire naturelle de Lyon. SACHA, (1).
Bhatti, S. (2012). Translating museums: A counter-history of South Asian museology. Left Coast Press.
Brown, J. R. (2013). The field of ancient Cham art in France: A twentieth-century creation—A study of museological and colonial contexts from the late nineteenth century to the present (Doctoral dissertation, SOAS, University of London).
Clémentin-Ojha, C., & Manguin, P. Y. (2007). A century in Asia: The history of the École française d’Extrême-Orient, 1898–2006. NUS Press.
Cuno, J. (2008). Who owns antiquity? Museums and the battle over ancient heritage. Princeton University Press.
Cuno, J. (2019). Culture war: The case against repatriating museum artifacts. Foreign Affairs. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/africa/culture-war
Delobel, S. (2004–2005). Genesis of the Cham Sculpture Museum in Da Nang. SACHA, (11).
Findlen, P. (2002). Inventing nature: Commerce, art, and science in the early modern cabinet of curiosities. In P. Smith & P. Findlen (Eds.), Merchants and marvels (pp. 297–323). Routledge.
Golzio, K.-H. (2004). Inscriptions of Campa. Shaker Verlag GmbH.
Guillon, E. (2001). Charles Lemire. SACHA, (8).
Hall, K. R. (1992). Economic history of early Southeast Asia. In N. Tarling (Ed.), The Cambridge history of Southeast Asia (Vol. 1, Pt. 1, pp. 183–272). Cambridge University Press.
Lockhart, B. M. (2010). Colonial and post-colonial constructions of Champa. In B. M. Lockhart & Trần Kỳ Phương (Eds.), The Cham of Vietnam (pp. 1–53). NUS Press.
Parmentier, H. (1909). Inventaire descriptif des monuments Čams de l’Annam, Tome I: L’étude de l’art čam. Leroux.
Parmentier, H. (1918). Inventaire descriptif des monuments Čams de l’Annam, Tome II: L’étude de l’art čam. Leroux.
Southworth, W. (2001). The origins of Campa in central Vietnam: A preliminary review (Doctoral dissertation, SOAS, University of London).
Stenuit, R. (2005). The Dr Morice collection: A shipwreck consignment of Cham statuary. Minerva, 16(5).
Taylor, K. (1992). The early kingdoms. In N. Tarling (Ed.), The Cambridge history of Southeast Asia (Vol. 1, Pt. 1, pp. 137–181). Cambridge University Press.
Taylor, N. (2000). Whose art are we studying? Writing Vietnamese art history from colonialism to the present. In Studies in Southeast Asian art: Essays in honor of Stanley J. O’Connor (pp. 143–157). Cornell University.
Trần, T. Đ. (2001). History of the museum. In E. Guillon (Ed.), Cham art: Treasures from the Da Nang Museum, Vietnam (pp. 10–12). River Books.
Wintle, C. (2013). Colonial perspectives on material culture from the Andaman and Nicobar Islands. In Colonial collecting and display: Encounters with material culture from the Andaman and Nicobar Islands (pp. 57–101). Berghahn.
Young, M. B. (1991). The Vietnam Wars, 1945–1990. HarperCollins.